Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: make block data type be consistent with hash method #15089

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

xudong963
Copy link
Member

@xudong963 xudong963 commented Mar 26, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR.

  • Fixes #[Link the issue here]

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-bugfix this PR patches a bug in codebase label Mar 26, 2024
@xudong963 xudong963 requested a review from Dousir9 March 26, 2024 02:17
@xudong963 xudong963 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into datafuselabs:main with commit fcf5ba8 Mar 26, 2024
76 of 78 checks passed
@xudong963 xudong963 deleted the fix_get_hash branch March 26, 2024 03:06
@xudong963 xudong963 restored the fix_get_hash branch March 26, 2024 03:14
@xudong963 xudong963 deleted the fix_get_hash branch March 26, 2024 03:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-bugfix this PR patches a bug in codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants