Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docker): misc docker fixes #8677

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

david-leifker
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

Copy link
Collaborator

@anshbansal anshbansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any obvious issues. Assuming CI passes LGTM

disable one unreliable golden test
@@ -572,9 +568,9 @@ jobs:
run: ./gradlew :metadata-ingestion:codegen
- name: Download Base Image
uses: ishworkh/docker-image-artifact-download@v1
if: ${{ needs.setup.outputs.publish != 'true' }}
if: ${{ needs.setup.outputs.publish != 'true' && steps.filter.outputs.datahub-ingestion-base == 'true' }}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not a blocker for this PR, but eventually I'd like to move all of the filtering logic (including dorny/paths-filter@v2 and these checks) into setup, so that the remainder of the workflow doesn't have any boolean logic

move docker image clean-up earlier
@anshbansal
Copy link
Collaborator

Only failures left are Vertica one + 2 cypress one. We will take them up individually. This should improve our CI situation for now.

@anshbansal anshbansal merged commit 6559148 into datahub-project:master Aug 22, 2023
52 of 56 checks passed
asikowitz pushed a commit to asikowitz/datahub that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
yoonhyejin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
devops PR or Issue related to DataHub backend & deployment merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants