-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-lmer, non-Bayesian models to support #32
Comments
Nice. Not sure what math it involves, but what do you think about |
Sure! Just added it |
|
So with probit, how do we want to structure the LHS and RHS? Once we figure that out, adding ordered probit will be trivial |
I like that. The only issue is we'll need to swap |
Yeah, the RHS is going to need stuff now bc φ, but it shouldn't be too bad. Any ideas for notation for multinomial logit, survival, and multiple ANOVA? Multinomial could be like ordered logit:
Survival models are complex and idk the best approach (nothing here looks simple) Also don't know best way to do MANOVA (no clear regression-like syntax here - @jrosen48 might have ideas |
Yeah I like that for multinomial. I have no idea on survival and MANOVA, honestly, but could do some looking into it. Do we still want to support Also, should we have the goal to support all of these before the initial release? Or get the release out basically now and develop these for v0.2? Last question - do you want to take an initial stab at probit or should I? I might have some time later tonight I could devote to it if you haven't already started (or if you just want to). |
I’m on it already, and also the clm ologit. It works with broom, so it
should be easy
I think probit + ordered probit and logit should be ready for initial
release, then multinomial and gang can come later
…On July 29, 2020 at 19:16:23, Daniel Anderson ***@***.***) wrote:
Yeah I like that for multinomial. I have no idea on survival and MANOVA,
honestly, but could do some looking into it.
Do we still want to support ordered::clm too? I haven't looked into that
at all. If the output from broom::tidy is the same or basically the same
it should be easy though.
Also, should we have the goal to support all of these before the initial
release? Or get the release out basically now and develop these for v0.2?
Last question - do you want to take an initial stab at probit or should I?
I might have some time later tonight I could devote to it if you haven't
already started (or if you just want to).
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAR7P6AVVUDU25KNW7AHIDR6CUUPANCNFSM4HUX3FZQ>
.
|
Perfect! |
This is mostly just a checklist of the more important models we might want to support with fancy math. In theory, these are all supported automatically with broom (though we might want to have a general catchall way to show non-fancy formulas):
glm(..., family = binomial(link = "logit"))
)glm(..., family = binomial(link = "probit"))
)MASS::polr(..., method = "logistic")
andordinal::clm(..., link = "logit")
)MASS::polr(..., method = "probit")
andordinal::clm(..., link = "probit")
)nnet::multinom()
)survival::Surv()
)stats::manova()
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: