Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced filtering and sorting of API Keys #868

Closed
3 tasks done
Sebbl22 opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Enhanced filtering and sorting of API Keys #868

Sebbl22 opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@Sebbl22
Copy link

Sebbl22 commented Jun 11, 2019

We have like 150+ API keys and are constantly adding more as we change our serilog sinks to Seq. The existing search box helps us by finding API Keys by name.

Additionaly, it would be great to have the following features:

  • Filter API Keys by "Applied properties". This would help us to identify all "production" or "qa" API Keys and see theri ingestion rates.

  • Filter by "Level" to quickly identify "incorrectly" set levels, e.g. "Debug" with a "production" property

  • Sort by "Events arrived", "Events accepted" and "Ingested data". We once had an incorrectly configured application which logged too many / large events and hence clogged our disks. With sorting by "Ingested data", it would be easier to identify the responsible app.

Maybe you could look into these features for one of the next releases.

@nblumhardt
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the suggestions.

"Filter API Keys by Applied Properties" is already implemented, at least insofar as typing either the property name, or value, into the filter box will identify them.

@KodrAus KodrAus changed the title Feature request: Enhanced filtering and sorting of API Keys Enhanced filtering and sorting of API Keys Sep 12, 2019
@KodrAus KodrAus added this to the 6.0-pre milestone Sep 12, 2019
@nblumhardt
Copy link
Member

image

@KodrAus KodrAus closed this as completed Oct 28, 2019
@Sebbl22
Copy link
Author

Sebbl22 commented Oct 30, 2019

Very nice, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants