New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support core-156 #47

andyjefferson opened this Issue Mar 27, 2017 · 0 comments


None yet
1 participant

andyjefferson commented Mar 27, 2017

The JDO spec has various rules about the ObjectIdClass, and one of these is that all fields should be present in the PersistenceCapable class. With our "targetClassName" extension this is not present, so we need to avoid this check for that field name

@andyjefferson andyjefferson added this to the 5.1.0.m2 milestone Mar 27, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment