New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support core-156 #47

Closed
andyjefferson opened this Issue Mar 27, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@andyjefferson
Member

andyjefferson commented Mar 27, 2017

The JDO spec has various rules about the ObjectIdClass, and one of these is that all fields should be present in the PersistenceCapable class. With our "targetClassName" extension this is not present, so we need to avoid this check for that field name

@andyjefferson andyjefferson added this to the 5.1.0.m2 milestone Mar 27, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment