Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update year-days to the latest version 馃殌 #3

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Dec 17, 2016

Version 2.0.0 of year-days just got published.

Dependency year-days
Current Version 1.0.0
Type dependency

The version 2.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of year-days.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 馃尨

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 17, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-87.5%) to 12.5% when pulling d8ede51 on greenkeeper/year-days-2.0.0 into 159bf83 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-87.5%) to 12.5% when pulling d8ede51 on greenkeeper/year-days-2.0.0 into 159bf83 on master.

@tunnckoCore tunnckoCore deleted the greenkeeper/year-days-2.0.0 branch December 18, 2016 22:33
@tunnckoCore
Copy link
Member

tunnckoCore commented Dec 18, 2016

Nope. Requires Node 4 for no reason. The reason is Sindre's feelings, so no, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants