Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Separate move action in two phases for creatures with swift ability #242

Open
Lucius4 opened this issue Aug 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Separate move action in two phases for creatures with swift ability #242

Lucius4 opened this issue Aug 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement type: enhancement low priority priority: low question type: question

Comments

@Lucius4
Copy link
Contributor

Lucius4 commented Aug 11, 2018

First, by clicking long arrow a creature would move one field forward. After that the arrow would shrink. Then the player could use some other cards and eventually use the remaining moving point by clicking the arrow again.
In example below the player, who wants to get King's Rider in front of the building, would save one mana point by this change – would move forward in standard way and then use Maneuver ability intead of using the ability twice.
swift
Lucius4 added a commit to Lucius4/citadel that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2018
@Lucius4
Movement action in two phases for creatures with swift ability
3edbab8 
It works as I wrote in davewx7#242 issue.
But I must admit long arrow is little confusing when a creature moves  only one tile forward.
@Lucius4 Lucius4 mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2018
Open
@sapientN3T sapientN3T added the enhancement type: enhancement label Sep 20, 2018
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 20, 2018

Does @davewx7 acknowledge this rule change as enhancement?

@ghost ghost added question type: question low priority priority: low labels Dec 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement type: enhancement low priority priority: low question type: question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Lucius4 @sapientN3T