Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update to rxjs 6 and axios 0.18 #5

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

chore: update to rxjs 6 and axios 0.18 #5

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

markfknight
Copy link

Hi,

I see there is a pull request open for RxJS 6 Alpha with conflicts, thought I would submit a PR for RxJS 6 now it is released.

Have bumped peer dependancies to Axios 0.18.0 and RxJS 6 also update the dev dependancies while I was at it.

All tests passing, comments welcome!

Thanks,
Mark

    modified:   .travis.yml
        * updated build to use Axios 0.18.0
    modified:   README.md
        * added RxJS 6 note
    modified:   package-lock.json
    modified:   package.json
        * updated RxJS to ^6.0.0
        * udapted Axios to 0.18.0
        * updated dev dependencies
    modified:   src/index.ts
        * changes required for RxJS 6 API (import)

    BREAKING CHANGE: peer dependency on RxJS 6
@karlos1337
Copy link

Since I need this functionality too I fork the repo and apply this PR and @tentenponce one in https://github.com/karlos1337/rxios , glad to remove it when @davguij apply the PR's here.

correct  syntax for advanced usage for RxJS 6
@markfknight
Copy link
Author

@davguij do you have any feedback for this pull request, or should i close?

@0x006EA1E5
Copy link

Will you guys be cutting a release for this anytime soon? Thanks :D

@davguij
Copy link
Owner

davguij commented Jun 21, 2020

Sorry for so much time without any updates from my side.

v2.0.0 should fix this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants