New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jedi 0.9.0 release #566
Comments
It's finished. I will now push it to PyPI. It took me a bit longer, because I ended up rewriting the whole import logic. The import logic looks now way more like Python's and has a |
Uploaded. (After a few more sith tests). It's definitely the best Jedi version, yet. :) |
The release seems to work well for me so far (not much testing yet, though). I have a question, though. What is |
Is that good enough? http://jedi.readthedocs.org/en/latest/docs/plugin-api.html#jedi.api.names |
I'm not clear how that is static analysis (at least any more than Jedi already is). Also, is this different from what was already there? I'm mainly a user of jedi via emacs-jedi, not the Python API, but I know that there has been something that does what seems to me to be the same thing for some time. Can you explain what's new here, that couldn't be done before? |
You're right. It's not a bit change. IMO there are two reasons why I would call it an improvement:
Is that enough? |
I will try to release Jedi in the next two days.
The only issues that I still want to tackle in this release are:
open().read()
doesn't work well. Jedi + Python3 unable to complete in open file context #412er.wrap
toevaluator.wrap
If there's something else that you really need or want in Jedi 0.9.0, please let me know. I would also be happy if a few people tried the current dev branch already. Thanks in advance!
~ Dave
Changelog:
also be possible to check for error messages (like compiling an AST would give)
in the future.
and more readable.
jedi.names
, a command to do static analysis. Thanks to thatsourcegraph guys for sponsoring this!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: