Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Further language updates.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Paul Warren authored and davidtauriello committed May 9, 2022
1 parent 7363f00 commit 5097dc7
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The specification of the current ESEF DQR rules can be found below:
The rules definitions make reference to the following terms:

* The **report taxonomy** is the DTS of XBRL Report, and includes the extension taxonomy.
* THe **base taxonomy** is the IFRS taxonomy corresponding to the ruleset version. The entry point used for each ruleset is shown below.
* The **base taxonomy** is the IFRS taxonomy corresponding to the ruleset version. The entry point used for each ruleset is shown below.

## IFRS Entry Points

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/DQC_IFRS_0008/DQC_0008.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Rule ID: DQC_0008

## Rule description

This rule evaluates whether a calculation relationship in the company's extension is a reversal of the calculation defined in the base taxonomy used for the filing. The rule checks if the element representing the calculation total and the element representing the component are a reversal of those same elements defined in the base taxonomy with the same calculation weight.
This rule evaluates whether a calculation relationship in the _report taxonomy_ is a reversal of the calculation defined in the base taxonomy used for the filing. Where a concept appears as a contributing item to a total in the _base taxonomy_, the concept representing the total cannot appear as a contributing item to that concept in the _report taxonomy_, unless the calculation weight is reversed.

This rule only compares the defined relationship between two elements joined by a single calculation arc in a company's calculation relationship and checks if the opposite of that relationship exists in the base taxonomy. Both elements in the calculation relationship must have a balance attribute of either debit or credit.
Note that this rule only checks for direct relationships between concepts, not all ancestors and descendents.

## Problem solved by the rule

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5097dc7

Please sign in to comment.