Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using latest version of Castle.Windsor 2.5.3 (with Castle.Core 2.5.2) #5

Closed
moodmosaic opened this issue Apr 28, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@moodmosaic
Copy link
Contributor

Are there any plans to use Castle.Windsor 2.5.3 and Castle.Core 2.5.2 in Agatha Castle adapter? In my local clone all tests passed. (Or we wait for Castle.Windsor 3.x which is going to be released soon?)

@davybrion
Copy link
Owner

there were no plans to upgrade, but that's only because i wasn't keeping up with the various container releases :)

there's no need to wait for 3.x as far as i'm concerned

@moodmosaic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, it's quite hard to keep up with all those containers. I would upgrade every 6-7 months though, just to keep up with the major changes. I'm using Windsor and after 2.5 release, it requires just two assemblies to run (as opposed to four previously). Many users might need to recompile the whole Agatha.Castle adapter just for this. (I may send a pull request with the updated assemblies, it will be fine either it gets merged or not)

@davybrion
Copy link
Owner

i'll definitely merge it, no worries :)

the agatha sources are downloaded more than the binary package which indeed suggest that many people rebuild against the specific container version they use

@moodmosaic
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, that was the first thing I also did :) but I'm always afraid, you know, if newer versions of containers have slightly different behaviour (and I always hope that it will show up on the unit-tests!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants