Query review : FA-02 FA-03

[ningyifan]

Needs to be revised to use the OA link to get to the object assigned to hasSource. While fixing this, please check for some real examples where there are multiple evidence items that support/challenge a claim. We expect that this would mean multiple data and/or statements would support/challenge a claim and each would have its own OA with a hasSource.

[jodischneider]

In the original DIKB, we have this example that both supports and
challenges:
http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/dikb-evidence/escitalopram_does_not_inhibit_cyp2d6.html

This translates to the following mp:Claim:
http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-claim-270

In
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dbmi-pitt/DIKB-Micropublication/master/data/mp-graphs/inferred-graph-oa-mp.xml
I see the following:

<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="

http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-data-223
">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="
http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/dikb-evidence/DIKB_evidence_ontology_v1.3.owl#EV_EX_Met_Enz_Inhibit_Cyp450_Hum_Microsome_Data
"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="∓Data"/>
<mp:challenges rdf:resource="
http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-claim-270
"/>
/owl:NamedIndividual

<!--

http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-statement-167
-->

<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="

http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-statement-167
">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="
http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/dikb-evidence/DIKB_evidence_ontology_v1.3.owl#Non_traceable_Drug_Label_Statement
"/>
<mp:supports rdf:resource="
http://purl.org/net/nlprepository/spl-ddi-annotation-poc#ddi-spl-annotation-claim-270
"/>
/owl:NamedIndividual

This should be a good example but needs review.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Yifan Ning notifications@github.com
wrote:

Needs to be revised to use the OA link to get to the object assigned to
hasSource. While fixing this, please check for some real examples where
there are multiple evidence items that support/challenge a claim. We expect
that this would mean multiple data and/or statements would
support/challenge a claim and each would have its own OA with a hasSource.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#30.

[samuelrosko]

I agree, that example should work for query FA-08, but it instead has two entries of support from that label statement rather than one support one challenges. Will have to look into.