Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trusted witness version, untrusted witness version #208

Open
dbosk opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #213
Open

Trusted witness version, untrusted witness version #208

dbosk opened this issue Apr 16, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #213

Comments

@dbosk
Copy link
Owner

dbosk commented Apr 16, 2020

63

@dbosk
Copy link
Owner Author

dbosk commented Apr 16, 2020

A key concern I have is the reliance on witnesses to authenticate
participation. The authors suggest that either trusted witnesses are used
or some number of untrusted ones. I do not see how untrusted witnesses
can lead to a secure outcome, even if there is a large number of them,
since there is no reason not to believe that all of them are colluding
to inflate the crowd size.

Using trusted witnesses, on the other hand, has similar pitfalls to the
existing approaches, as discussed in the prior work section: it is hard
to find witnesses that all opposing factions will trust, and it is hard
to scale this approach to large crowds. Since the distance-bounding
protocol is not specified in this paper, it is hard to assess its
practical limitations, but typical phone-to-phone communications have
relatively small range, so to count all participants in a large protest
witnesses need to be deployed throughout the protest.

@dbosk dbosk added this to the minimal-submittable milestone Apr 16, 2020
@dbosk dbosk added this to To do in CANS 2021 Apr 16, 2020
@dbosk dbosk moved this from To do to In progress in CANS 2021 Apr 16, 2020
@dbosk dbosk self-assigned this Apr 16, 2020
@dbosk dbosk linked a pull request Apr 20, 2020 that will close this issue
@dbosk dbosk moved this from In progress to Review in progress in CANS 2021 Apr 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
CANS 2021
  
Review in progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant