Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/qa test #599

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat/qa test #599

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

imotai
Copy link
Contributor

@imotai imotai commented Aug 7, 2023


PR-Codex overview

Focus of the PR:

This PR focuses on adding unit tests for the has_key function in the KeyStore module.

Detailed summary:

  • Added unit tests for the has_key function in the KeyStore module.
  • Created tests for existing keys, non-existing keys, invalid input, and file errors.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 7, 2023

Sure, I can help you with that.

  1. Test Plan:
  • Test that the method correctly returns true if the given key exists in the key store.
  • Test that the method correctly returns false if the given key does not exist in the key store.
  • Test that the method correctly handles invalid input by returning false (e.g. empty key string).
  • Test that the method correctly handles errors that may occur during file I/O operations.
  1. Test Case Solution:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use std::io::Write;
    use tempfile::TempDir;

    #[test]
    fn test_has_key_existing() {
        let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");
        let real_path = tmp_dir_path.path().to_str().unwrap().to_string();
        let keystore = KeyStore::new(KeyStoreConfig { key_root_path: real_path.clone() });
        let key = "test_key";
        let value = b"value";
        keystore.write_key(key, value).unwrap();
        assert_eq!(keystore.has_key(key), true);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_has_key_non_existing() {
        let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");
        let real_path = tmp_dir_path.path().to_str().unwrap().to_string();
        let keystore = KeyStore::new(KeyStoreConfig { key_root_path: real_path.clone() });
        let key = "test_key";
        assert_eq!(keystore.has_key(key), false);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_has_key_invalid_input() {
        let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");
        let real_path = tmp_dir_path.path().to_str().unwrap().to_string();
        let keystore = KeyStore::new(KeyStoreConfig { key_root_path: real_path.clone() });
        let empty_key = "";
        assert_eq!(keystore.has_key(empty_key), false);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_has_key_file_error() {
        let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");
        let real_path = tmp_dir_path.path().to_str().unwrap().to_string();
        let keystore = KeyStore::new(KeyStoreConfig { key_root_path: real_path.clone() });
        let mut invalid_file = std::fs::File::create(format!("{}/INVALID", real_path)).unwrap();
        invalid_file.write_all(b"invalid content").unwrap(); // create an invalid file
        let invalid_key = "INVALID";
        assert_eq!(keystore.has_key(invalid_key), false);
    }
}
  • For the test case named test_has_key_existing, we create a new KeyStore instance, write a new key-value pair to the key store, and then verify that the method correctly returns true when called with the key we just wrote.
  • For the test case named test_has_key_non_existing, we create a new KeyStore instance and call the method with a key that we know has not been written to the key store, and then verify that the method correctly returns false.
  • For the test case named test_has_key_invalid_input, we create a new KeyStore instance and call the method with an empty key string, and then verify that the method correctly returns false.
  • For the test case named test_has_key_file_error, we create a new KeyStore instance and call the method with a non-existent key, but we also create an invalid file in the key store directory to simulate a file I/O error. We then verify that the method correctly returns false.

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 7, 2023

my prompt
I have a rust struct named KeyStore with the following definition

pub struct KeyStoreConfig {
    pub key_root_path: String,
}

pub struct KeyStore {
    config: KeyStoreConfig,
}
impl KeyStore {
    pub fn new(config: KeyStoreConfig) -> Self {
        Self { config }
    }
    pub fn write_key(&self, key: &str, value: &[u8]) -> Result<()> {}
}

I created a method named has_key with a str parameter named key and the method return a bool type
please finish the following task for me

  1. write a test plan with concise words to tell me about how will you test the method
  2. write test case solution to finish the test plan and some rule you
    must follow
    2.1 you must make sure the code is compilable
    2.2 if you need some extra libraries to finish the test cases, you must tell me
    2.3 you must put all test cases and libraries into mod tests
    2.4 if there are some filesystem paths as parameters, you must use tempdir to generate it and you
    can follow the code example
let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");
let real_path = tmp_dir_path.path().to_str().unwrap().to_string();

2.5 if you need some data to prepare for the test case , you must not guess how to generate it and you use the related methods what I give to you

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #599 (d15eb0d) into main (bb44ae3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head d15eb0d differs from pull request most recent head 2484d76. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2484d76 to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #599   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.70%   61.70%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         470      470           
  Branches       69       69           
=======================================
  Hits          290      290           
  Misses        180      180           
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 61.70% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 11, 2023

@CodiumAI-Agent review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding unit tests for the has_key function in the KeyStore module.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Tests
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: True
  • Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused on adding tests for a specific function in a specific module.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and focused. The tests cover different scenarios which is good for thorough testing. However, it would be beneficial to add comments to the tests explaining what each one is testing for future reference.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: src/storage/src/key_store.rs
      suggestion: Consider using a setup function to avoid code repetition in your tests. This function can handle the creation of the KeyStore instance and the TempDir, which are repeated in each test. [medium]
      relevant line: let tmp_dir_path = TempDir::new("tmp_dir").expect("create temp dir");

    • relevant file: src/storage/src/key_store.rs
      suggestion: It would be beneficial to add assertions to check the error messages when the tests fail. This will ensure that the function fails for the right reasons. [medium]
      relevant line: assert_eq!(keystore.has_key(key), false);

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 12, 2023

@qa-agent

2 similar comments
@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 12, 2023

@qa-agent

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 12, 2023

@qa-agent

@qa-agent
Copy link

Unit Test Analysis

🎯level:Important
🥋explanation:The pull request adds new test cases for the KeyStore module, which is an important component of the software. These test cases cover different scenarios such as existing keys, non-existing keys, invalid inputs, and file errors. Having comprehensive unit tests for the KeyStore module is important to ensure its correct functionality and to catch any potential bugs or issues.

Existing Test Cases

Summary Category File
Test that the has_key function returns true for an existing key. positive testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false for a non-existing key. positive testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false for an empty key. negative testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false when there is a file error. negative testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs

Recommended Test Cases

Summary Category
Test that the has_key function works correctly for different edge cases, such as null inputs, empty inputs, and large inputs. edge testing

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 13, 2023

@qa-agent

@qa-agent
Copy link

Unit Test Analysis

🎯level:Important
📣explanation:The pull request introduces changes to the key_store.rs file, which is a core component of the software. It is important to have unit tests to ensure that the changes do not introduce any bugs or regressions in the functionality of the key store.

Existing Test Cases

Summary Category File

Recommended Test Cases

Summary Category

@imotai
Copy link
Contributor Author

imotai commented Aug 13, 2023

@qa-agent

@qa-agent
Copy link

Unit Test Analysis

🎯level:Important
📣explanation:The pull request introduces changes to the key_store.rs file, which is a core component of the software. It is important to have unit tests to ensure that the changes do not introduce any bugs or regressions in the functionality of the key store.

Existing Test Cases

Summary Category File
Test that the has_key function returns true for an existing key. positive testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false for a non-existing key. positive testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false for an empty key. positive testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs
Test that the has_key function returns false when there is a file error. negative testing src/storage/src/key_store.rs

Recommended Test Cases

Summary Category

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants