Dcv 1682 possibility to change the dbt root for all hooks

[BAntonellini]

This PR introduces the possibility of specifying your dbt project for all hooks.

This can be done by setting dbt-project-dir in the user's .dbt-checkpoint.yaml: dbt-project-dir: my_project

With that, we modified the get manifest and get catalog behavior to use this content.

Now there is a precedence in flags and config usage:

1. custom --manifest path/to/manifest.json or --cmd-flags ++project+dir
2. if used, config's file my_project/target/manifest.json is passed to manifest or --project-dir in dbt commands
3. default flags. For example, in --manifest: target/manifest.json

This way, if both approaches are used, args: [] content takes precedence over config file one.

With these changes, it's no longer needed to provide a --manifest or --catalog to each of the check[...] hooks and repeating the same args multiple times, leaving the following as a working example of .pre-commit-config.yaml:

repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/BAntonellini/dbt-checkpoint
    rev: 021c9cd38c518a4fc5d4748a317d573514b89186

    hooks:
      - id: check-script-semicolon
      - id: check-script-has-no-table-name
      - id: dbt-test
      - id: dbt-docs-generate
        args: ["--cmd-flags", "++no+compile"]
      - id: check-model-has-all-columns
      - id: check-model-columns-have-desc
      - id: check-source-table-has-description
      - id: check-script-ref-and-source
      - id: check-model-has-description

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.02 🎉

Comparison is base (f58bd0d) 98.58% compared to head (53b9031) 98.61%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #138      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.58%   98.61%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        2269     2311      +42     
  Branches      304      309       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         2237     2279      +42     
  Misses         18       18              
  Partials       14       14              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dbt_checkpoint/check_column_desc_are_same.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_column_name_contract.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_macro_arguments_have_desc.py	96.22% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_macro_has_description.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_columns_have_desc.py	96.22% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_has_all_columns.py	96.61% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_has_description.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_has_meta_keys.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_has_properties_file.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_checkpoint/check_model_has_tests.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 35 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[BAntonellini]

@dbt-checkpoint/montreal-analytics @dbt-checkpoint/datacoves

tests created, please provide any feedback as it seems this will be a nice addition as discussed in Issue #39

[ssassi]

LGTM

[JFrackson]

lgtm