Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 1.8.latest] Fix: Order-insensitive unit test equality assertion for expected/actual with multiple nulls #10222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 84456f5 from #10202.

…al with multiple nulls (#10202)

(cherry picked from commit 84456f5)
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 24, 2024 14:12
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label May 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.25%. Comparing base (11ea573) to head (168ddcd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           1.8.latest   #10222      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       88.26%   88.25%   -0.01%     
==============================================
  Files             181      181              
  Lines           22753    22756       +3     
==============================================
+ Hits            20083    20084       +1     
- Misses           2670     2672       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 85.44% <100.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
unit 62.73% <60.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MichelleArk MichelleArk merged commit 4869cef into 1.8.latest May 24, 2024
68 checks passed
@MichelleArk MichelleArk deleted the backport-10202-to-1.8.latest branch May 24, 2024 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants