Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple values in a cell #65

Closed
kcoyle opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Multiple values in a cell #65

kcoyle opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
Basic requirements that are definitely in scope POSTPONED

Comments

@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator

kcoyle commented Jul 17, 2020

We need a simple rule for including more than one value for a cell. This comes up with labels (where there can be more than one label because of language strings) and value constraints (pick lists, multiple URI stems, etc.) What are some possibilities here? Ideally we should select one.

@philbarker
Copy link
Collaborator

Am I right in thinking that multiple values in a single cell will always be alternatives, i.e. conbined with logical OR. I think if anyone wants both of two values (logical AND, eg. rdf:type must be schema:Book and bibo:Book) then they would repeat the row?

Language string labels presumably have the added complexity that we need language: value pairs.

@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcoyle commented Jul 17, 2020

I think we should start with OR, which seems to be the more useful case. Although I can imagine needing AND perhaps we can consider that second.

As for language strings, at the moment I was thinking only of the rdf:langString in which the string and language are presented as a single literal unit, like
"title"@en
"titolo"@it

2.5 rdf:langString

The class rdf:langString is the class of language-tagged string values. rdf:langString is an instance of rdfs:Datatype and a subclass of rdfs:Literal

@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcoyle commented Jul 20, 2020

@philbarker I thought again about your example. In the case of rdf:type it can clearly be repeated, just as many other properties can be repeated. The repetition is an implied AND. We do not have (yet) a way to clearly state either OR or AND between properties, e.g. (foaf:name OR (foaf:familyName AND foaf:givenName)). rdf:type may be a particular exception due to the rules regarding RDF classes, to whit that "things" can be members of more than one class. This kind of relationship between properties (or even between entities) is even harder to express in a tabular form than the "OR" that this issue addresses. I had some ideas around this but I think it fits better into a 2nd phase of our template.

@kcoyle kcoyle added the Basic requirements that are definitely in scope label Aug 17, 2020
@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kcoyle commented Jan 5, 2021

This is now being discussed at dcmi/dctap#4, which links backed to here.

@kcoyle kcoyle closed this as completed Jan 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Basic requirements that are definitely in scope POSTPONED
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants