bump marathon to v1.4.0-RC8

[jdef]

High Level Description

• bump Marathon from 1.4.0-RC7 to 1.4.0-RC8

Related Issues

• MARATHON-1378 pod tasks are missing DiscoveryInfo; broken for minuteman
• MARATHON-1383 Marathon is not setting network-scope flag for mesocontainerizer

Checklist for all PR's

• Included a test which will fail if code is reverted but test is not. If there is no test please explain here:
  • dcos-networking team is providing tests for MARATHON-1378 and MARATHON-1383
• Read the DC/OS contributing guidelines
• Followed relevant code rules Rules for Packages and Systemd

Checklist for component/package updates:

If you are changing components or packages in DC/OS (e.g. you are bumping the sha or ref of anything underneath packages), then in addition to the above please also include:

• Change log from the last version integrated (this should be a link to commits for easy verification and review): https://github.com/mesosphere/marathon/blob/releases/1.4/changelog.md
• Test Results: https://teamcity.mesosphere.io/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=Oss_Marathon_Packages&buildId=556839
• Code Coverage (if available): https://teamcity.mesosphere.io/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=Oss_Marathon_Packages&buildId=556839

---

PLEASE FILL IN THE TEMPLATE ABOVE / DO NOT REMOVE ANY SECTIONS ABOVE THIS LINE

Instructions and Review Process

What is the review process and when will my changes land?

All PRs require 2 approvals using github's pull request reviews.

Reviewers should be:

• Developers who understand the code being modified.
• Developers responsible for code that interacts with or depends on the code being modified.

It is best to proactively ask for 2 reviews by @mentioning the candidate reviewers in the PR comments area. The responsibility is on the developer submitting the PR to follow-up with reviewers and make sure a PR is reviewed in a timely manner. Once a PR has 2 ship-it's, no red reviews, and all tests are green it will be included in the next train.

[spahl]

🚢

[lingmann]

@jdef can we get a corresponding enterprise PR bump as well?

[spahl]

@lingmann there is one. I referenced this PR there

[lingmann]

I see it now, thanks

[adam-mesos]

Verified SHA1 of tarball. Assuming rc8 is better than rc7, and only includes the 2 fixes listed in the PR description.

[jdef]

The JIRAs mentioned were the only ones linked to the GH tickets. Possible that there are JIRAs for other changes mentioned in the change log.

…

On Feb 13, 2017 7:40 PM, "Adam" ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** approved this pull request. Verified SHA1 of tarball. Assuming rc8 is better than rc7, and only includes the 2 fixes listed in the PR description. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1231 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACPVLAHwvdWXhnr8dWRQ9r47k6spXOglks5rcPf6gaJpZM4L9-SH> .