-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
Conversation
Thanks for the contribution! |
@dcowden I need to spend some more time on another project over the next few weeks, but I would like to have an alpha release of |
@fragmuffin not sure there is a plan for release of the 1.x stream, but it is definitely time. Your parts library is awesome Do you prefer to keep your library separate from cq, or would you be interested in bundling your code with cq? |
@dcowden I feel like the overlap between Do you feel strongly about merging them? |
@fragmuffin, no definitely not, I just wanted to offer. Coordinated releases is fine with me. It would probably be easiest for users if we adopt common numbering. @jmwright are you ready to do a call 1.x release soon? |
Thank you very much for your consideration @dcowden , that means a lot to me. |
We could release v1.1.0 any time. I was hoping to address issue #186 before the release, but I'm not sure I'm going to get to it. |
@jmwright well I'm in no rush. out of curiosity, what's your release process? I ask because I set up a semi-automated deployment for another PyPI package I wrote. would you be interested in something similar for |
When we tag a release Travis will push it to PyPi. When we commit there's standard automated testing and coverage checks, but that's as far as it goes. The more we can automate our testing and release process the better in my mind. @dcowden understands how CI fits with CQ a lot better than I do though. |
addressing issue #188