Incorrect size report after cork_array_ensure_size

[scossu]

To reproduce:

• Reallocate space in an array with cork_array_ensure_size
• Assign a value manually to the expanded elements of the array (probably optional but usefult to test the reallocation)
• Call cork_array_size(array) or array->size (undocumented by the way, but seems to work exactly the same)

Expected result: the number of elements including the ones inserted manually.

Actual result: the number of element prior to expansion.

Example program:

#include <libcork/ds.h>

typedef cork_array(int) Array;

int main()
{
    Array _a;
    Array *a = &_a;

    cork_array_init(a);
    printf("%lu\n", a->size);

    cork_array_append(a, 8);
    printf("%lu\n", a->size);

    cork_array_ensure_size(a, 2);
    cork_array_at(a, 1) = 36;
    printf("array->size: %lu\n", cork_array_size(a));
    printf("cork_array_size: %lu\n", cork_array_size(a));
    printf("At 1: %d\n", cork_array_at(a, 1));

    return(0);
}

Output:

0
1
array->size: 1
cork_array_size: 1
At 1: 36

Is this is the expected behavior?

[scossu]

I just noticed that I can change a->size in my program and that it affects cork_array_size, still the question remains: while cork_array_append automatically adjusts the size, shall a manual expansion not do so as well?

[dcreager]

Hi Stefano! Sorry for the delay. This is the intended behavior — cork_array_ensure_size ensures that the capacity of the array is big enough to hold the requested number of elements, but you still have to use something like cork_array_append to add new elements and bump the size field. The documentation sort of mentions it, but I could add some text to make that more explicit.