-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: OpenLiteSpeed Support as webserver in addition to nginx/apache #5664
Comments
The product has a slightly different name, I modified the issue. |
Most people have left Apache behind long ago. But there are other requests for alternate webservers in the issue queue, especially Eventually we'll probably make a pluggable setup for this, but it's not likely to come any time soon. However, you could easily replace Apache with OpenLiteSpeed using a .ddev/web-build/Dockerfile |
+1 Vote - we use on our production systems Litespeed HTTP Server. We would like to have OpenLiteSpeed on our local ddev environment too. |
Backdrop reports 13% of their reporting sites using LiteSpeed |
Thanks @andy-blum - great to see you! Do you have any insight into why that would be? I'm pretty sure that's not a general trend, but don't know. |
@quicksketch ☝️ |
Backdrop's ~13% usage seems to be inline with global usage from https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/web_server LiteSpeed has been around forever but seems to have quietly snuck up into becoming the 3rd most popular web server (excluding CloudFlare). |
Thanks @quicksketch ! |
Can't believe that IIS comes in 4th! Craziness! |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
No, but supporting a fast webserver could be a real benefit.
Describe your solution
OpenLiteSpeed Web Server has some real benefits over Apache by supporting Apache related things and supporting anti-DDoS things...
https://github.com/litespeedtech/openlitespeed
Additional context
Related:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: