Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Minor docs for apt/yum package management #4825

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 17, 2023

Conversation

rfay
Copy link
Member

@rfay rfay commented Apr 17, 2023

The Issue

Our setup for apt/yum package management wasn't adequately explained.

Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

@mattstein mattstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bullet points read like an outline of points to make rather than an explanation of package management, but a lot of this page is written this way so I kept my suggestions small.

@@ -179,3 +179,14 @@ This is done automatically by the release build on a dedicated Windows test runn

!!!tip "We shouldn’t use this high-security keyfob approach to signing on the next go-around with the certs."
It’s way too difficult to manage, and the Safenet software is atrocious.

## APT and YUM/RPM Package Management
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Learned today that APT and YUM are acronyms! 🌈⭐️

docs/content/developers/release-management.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/content/developers/release-management.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/content/developers/release-management.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/content/developers/release-management.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rfay and others added 2 commits April 17, 2023 11:34
Co-authored-by: Matt Stein <m@ttste.in>
Co-authored-by: Matt Stein <m@ttste.in>
@rfay
Copy link
Member Author

rfay commented Apr 17, 2023

The bullet points read like an outline of points to make rather than an explanation of package management

Yeah, the intent is to just expose layers of technology to people who might understand them in a time of need, rather than to actually explain everything.

@rfay
Copy link
Member Author

rfay commented Apr 17, 2023

@mattstein you may want to look again to see if you approve how I handled unreachable URLs (manage.fury.io).

@mattstein
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

@rfay Seems fine for the awkward situation that it is. In a perfect world it’d be a normal URL that could have a little lock icon next to it to indicate (with a title attribute) that it requires authentication. Not sure how to live in that world quickly, though.

@rfay rfay merged commit 9898535 into ddev:master Apr 17, 2023
3 checks passed
@rfay rfay deleted the 20230417_package_mgt branch April 17, 2023 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants