Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refactor/modernize jest babel es6 #44

Open
wants to merge 60 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Refactor/modernize jest babel es6 #44

wants to merge 60 commits into from

Conversation

deadratfink
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8fee655 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8fee655 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8fee655 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 764cd45 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 764cd45 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 764cd45 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited by codecov bot

Codecov Report

Merging #44 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #44    +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%   100%            
======================================
  Files           9     10     +1     
  Lines         525    155   -370     
  Branches       68      0    -68     
======================================
- Hits          525    155   -370
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/validation/options-schema-utils.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/serialize-utils.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/writer.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/validation/options-schema.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/jy-transform.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/reader.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/io-utils.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/validation/joi-extensions.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/transformer.js 100% <100%> (ø)
src/constants.js 100% <100%> (ø)
... and 10 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1989834...0d37291. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6c204ad on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6c204ad on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8729606 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8729606 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into c477017 on master.

@deadratfink deadratfink added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Jul 9, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 195d1fa on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 195d1fa on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 195d1fa on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a3d5c57 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 6, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a3d5c57 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a3d5c57 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 6, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a3d5c57 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3cdadf7 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3cdadf7 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3cdadf7 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3cdadf7 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3cdadf7 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 23, 2017 •
edited

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 0d37291 on refactor/modernize_jest_babel_es6 into 1989834 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@deadratfink deadratfink

Labels
improvement qa review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v3.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@deadratfink @coveralls @codecov-io