Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Honor existing deployed limits #159

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 25, 2024

Conversation

matt-domsch-sp
Copy link
Contributor

In a cluster with auto-scaling sidekiq servers, a new server entering the pool runs Queues.start, which looks at the config file and sets the limit and process_limit values accordingly. However, if at runtime these values have been changed dynamically for any reason, this overwrites the values with what is in the config file, or removes the limits if there are none in the config file. This is unexpected behavior.

Instead, at startup, honor the values found in redis if any are present. Only set the values if none are present in redis.

In a cluster with auto-scaling sidekiq servers, a new server entering
the pool runs Queues.start, which looks at the config file and sets
the limit and process_limit values accordingly.  However, if at
runtime these values have been changed dynamically for any reason,
this overwrites the values with what is in the config file, or removes
the limits if there are none in the config file.  This is unexpected
behavior.

Instead, at startup, honor the values found in redis if any are
present.  Only set the values if none are present in redis.
@matt-domsch-sp
Copy link
Contributor Author

This requires #160 to get merged first so CI passes.

@deanpcmad deanpcmad merged commit 8a24a0c into deanpcmad:master Feb 25, 2024
0 of 24 checks passed
@deanpcmad
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@matt-domsch-sp matt-domsch-sp deleted the honor-limit-at-startup branch February 25, 2024 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants