fix: Define accuracy and add the other drawback

content/ADR-231-voting-power-tracking-for-marketplace-saved-items

@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ This document outlines the guidelines for counting the number of users who have
 
 Previously, users of the Decentraland Marketplace needed an option to save items for future reference, leading to missed opportunities for creators and potential customers. The Marketplace Lists feature was introduced to tackle this problem, enabling users to easily create and manage lists of items they plan to save for later and offering a gamified experience.
 
-To improve accuracy and empower community members, a Voting Power criterion has been introduced for calculating the number of users who have saved an item in a list, ensuring a more precise count of saved items.
+Defining accuracy as a measure of how many users involved in the project added an item to their list, a Voting Power criterion has been introduced for calculating that number to improve the metric and to empower community members, ensuring a more precise count of saved items.
 
 ## Solution Space Exploration
 
-The strategy employed in Places has been adapted to the new feature requirements. When a new item is added to the list, the user's Voting Power (VP) is retrieved from the Snapshot platform and stored for future use. Then, the number of times an item has been added to a list only considers users with a specific VP.
+To prevent users from creating different accounts and adding the same item to a list multiple times with them, the strategy employed in Places has been adapted to the new feature requirements. When a new item is added to the list, the user's Voting Power (VP) is retrieved from the Snapshot platform and stored for future use. Then, the number of times an item has been added to a list only considers users with a specific VP.
 
-One potential drawback of this method is that users may transfer their assets to a new account and re-add an item to the list with the same Voting Power, as it is only recorded once an item is added. As a result, this could cause the count for that item to be artificially inflated, as the same assets would be counted twice when retrieving the VP, resulting in an inaccurate count.
+One potential drawback of this method, on the one hand, is that users may transfer their assets to a new account and re-add an item to the list with the same Voting Power, as it is only recorded once an item is added. As a result, this could cause the count for that item to be artificially inflated, as the same assets would be counted twice when retrieving the VP, resulting in an inaccurate count. On the other hand, this approach could also lead to undervalue new users or those with less Voting Power who have added an item to their list, as their addition would not be considered in the final count.
 
 ## Specification