-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multiple attachments on an initiative #6880
Comments
@carolromero as edgar mentionned above in this comment we need to decide how we want to handle multiple attachements on initiative. |
@virgile-dev yes, I would change the system so that adding new attachments doesn't delete the previous ones. Are you guys thinking of sending a PR of this? |
@carolromero no PR in the pipe, we are running on low on dev ressources this end of year 😔 |
Fix can be tested here https://decidim-staging-pr-309.herokuapp.com |
In #7452 (comment) @ahukkanen raises this concern:
@decidim/product could you confirm how to handle this? |
@oriolgual I'm getting a server error when creating an initiative type. |
Hi all! Seems like this issue and PR has stagnated :/
Let's fix this bug |
Seems like (obviously) the review PR isn't working anymore
I tried this locally but still have the same bug regarding the attachments deletion: bug-initiatives-attachment.mp4 |
Describe the bug
These were found while doing QA on #5736
In the edit form one is under the impression they can add other attachements (the plural form attachements is used both in the wizard and the edit form). But when doing so the attachement that was already on the initiative gets replaced by the one newly uploaded. The new attachement should be added and not replace the one that was already there.
Users should be to add several attachement while creating the initiative via the wizard.
I tested adding more attachements via the admin and they display correctly.
Also I notice that when hitting the cross to delete the attachement and clicking on the update button the attachment still displays on the initiative.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: