Use with_any_scope instead of with_scope for assemblies and processes

[fblupi]

🎩 What? Why?

Use with_any_scope instead of with_scope for assemblies and processes.

📌 Related Issues

• Fixes Error accessing processes or assemblies via URL with multiple filters by scope #11413

Testing

1. Go to processes or assemblies
2. Filter by scope
3. Filter by another scope
4. Check the page loads successfully
5. Access again the page reloading with the URL with the two filters and see the page loads successfully

♥️ Thank you!

[alecslupu]

I have checked and the fix as advertised, Yet there are some fixes that could be done in this part.

[alecslupu]

I have checked and the fix as advertised, Yet there are some fixes that could be done in this part.

Scenario 1:

1. visit an assembly or Participatory process.
2. When you refresh the entire page, the filter pill is dissapearing:
   
   vs
   

Scenario 2:

1. Visit participatory space
2. Select any scope that does not have anything assigned
3. See the message "There are no active nor upcoming processes. Here is a list of the past ones." is being displayed
4. Go to scope filter and choose a scope that has something into it ...
5. See the message and a process card are being displayed

[fblupi]

I have checked and the fix as advertised, Yet there are some fixes that could be done in this part.

Hi @alecslupu, I have fixed the issues you mentioned. Let's wait until the pipeline is green and review it again 🙂

[alecslupu]

LGTM

[alecslupu]

Merging as per my previous approval.

[andreslucena]

Adding the "no-backport" label as this can't be reproduced in v0.28 and also it isn't in v0.26 (as this comes from the "Searchlight removal" change).