Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evote - Polling station officers flow #7705

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Mar 26, 2021

Conversation

htmlboy
Copy link
Contributor

@htmlboy htmlboy commented Mar 24, 2021

🎩 What? Why?

This is a design proposal for the Polling Officers station flow.

📌 Related Issues

Link your PR to an issue

📷 Screenshots

Please add screenshots of the changes you're proposing

First step: one or more polling stations listed in the polling station officer zone:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 13

Identify a person:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 16

Person is not in census:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 18

Person is in census, verify voter:
2021-03-25 10 20 55

Voter hasn't voted yet; list of available questions and mark person as voted:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 21

Voter has voted in-person:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 23

Voter has voted online but we can overwrite the vote with an in-person one:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 25

The officer is leaving the area without marking that a person has voted AND submitting the change:
photo_2021-03-24 16 59 27

♥️ Thank you!

@agustibr
Copy link
Contributor

Great proposal @htmlboy !

Just some comments about the form inputs for these two views:

  • Identify a person: I think the birthdate inputs are missing.
  • Person is in census, verify voter: I understand this view comes from Identify a person, so we already have the document_type, document_number and birthdate data, but the postal_code is missing, and the full_name can be removed as is not needed.

Please, correct me if I'm wrong 😁

@carolromero
Copy link
Member

@htmlboy these are great proposals, thank you!
There's only one view that should be changed, the Person is in census, verify voter.
image

I apologize that the mockup is confusing. It is not a form to enter data, but the data that the system returns when you enter the document type and number.

@htmlboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

htmlboy commented Mar 25, 2021

@decidim/product Hi, I just updated the description of the flow above with this screen:

2021-03-25 10 20 55

Is it ok?

@carolromero
Copy link
Member

@htmlboy it is perfect :) thanks!

agustibr
agustibr previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2021
@agustibr
Copy link
Contributor

@decidim/mantainers this is approved by @decidim/product, please can you review it?
Thanks 😄

@mrcasals mrcasals merged commit c40c681 into develop Mar 26, 2021
@mrcasals mrcasals deleted the feat/polling-station-officers-flow branch March 26, 2021 13:20
@leio10 leio10 added the contract: e-voting Barcelona City Council contract label Apr 12, 2021
@leio10 leio10 mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2021
12 tasks
@leio10 leio10 added module: elections type: feature PRs or issues that implement a new feature labels Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contract: e-voting Barcelona City Council contract module: elections type: feature PRs or issues that implement a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants