Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chaincfg: Introduce explicit ver upgrades agenda. #2713

Merged

Conversation

davecgh
Copy link
Member

@davecgh davecgh commented Aug 23, 2021

This adds a new definition for the upcoming agenda vote to reject new transaction and script versions until they are explicitly enabled via a consensus vote as defined by DCP0008. It does not include any code to make decisions or bump the versions. It is only the definition.

@davecgh davecgh added this to the 1.7.0 milestone Aug 23, 2021
@davecgh davecgh force-pushed the chaincfg_explicit_ver_upgrades_agenda branch from 8a32694 to b1eea8f Compare August 25, 2021 08:20
@JoeGruffins
Copy link
Member

JoeGruffins commented Aug 26, 2021

as defined by DCP0008

Where is that definition? I don't see in https://github.com/decred/dcps Did I miss something big? I see there's another pr I need to catch up on #2716 ?

edit: https://proposals.decred.org/record/3a98861

Oh yeah...

This adds a new definition for the upcoming agenda vote to reject new
transaction and script versions until they are explicitly enabled via a
consensus vote as defined by DCP0008.  It does not include any code to
make decisions or bump the versions.  It is only the definition.
@davecgh davecgh force-pushed the chaincfg_explicit_ver_upgrades_agenda branch from b1eea8f to e5ba0f6 Compare August 27, 2021 18:34
@davecgh davecgh merged commit e5ba0f6 into decred:master Aug 27, 2021
@davecgh davecgh deleted the chaincfg_explicit_ver_upgrades_agenda branch August 27, 2021 19:11
@davecgh davecgh mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2021
56 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants