Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tree phase comments #124

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Tree phase comments #124

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

ineiti
Copy link
Member

@ineiti ineiti commented Dec 4, 2015

Open for first comments of the new tree/peer structures.

  • tree: peers (nodes) and trees
  • phase: different parts of an algorithm (announce, commit, challenge, response for CoSi)

@ineiti ineiti self-assigned this Dec 4, 2015
// The public-key
PubKey abstract.Point
// The private-key - mostly for ourselves
PrivKey abstract.Secret
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this should be in the Peer struct, given that it seems like it's definitely only for ourselves and should probably be "known" by ourselves in some other way.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true. I just thought that it's the most convenient place to put it by putting similar things together. Else I'll have to put the private key somewhere in the Node structure (which doesn't exist yet)

@ineiti ineiti mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2015
// The hash-id of this list
Hash hashid.HashId
// The suite used in this list
Suite abstract.Suite
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following our discussion, I think suite should not be here. Should it not be higher up, in the definition of what application we want to run(stamp,bitcosi etc) ?

@ineiti ineiti added this to the SDA - Secure Distributed API milestone Jan 5, 2016
@ineiti
Copy link
Member Author

ineiti commented Jan 5, 2016

Will start new

@ineiti ineiti closed this Jan 5, 2016
@ineiti ineiti deleted the tree_phase branch January 5, 2016 07:35
ineiti pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2018
Fix for configurable suite
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants