-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a plan to add support for BLS12-381? #402
Labels
Comments
No, there is no plan for that, but we do accept PRs. |
Note there is a now a wrapper around a very good performant bls12-381 library. Unfortunately wrapper is for a fork of kyber. Mentionning just in case. |
@nikkolasg thanks for the heads up. I will take a look. |
Merged
This has been added in #505 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It seems many projects(e.g. zcash and ethereum 2.0) now use BLS 12-381 for BLS signature. BN256 is documented as weak in this issue. Is there a plan to add support for BLS12-381?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: