Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there a plan to add support for BLS12-381? #402

Closed
wangyifan opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #505
Closed

Is there a plan to add support for BLS12-381? #402

wangyifan opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #505

Comments

@wangyifan
Copy link

It seems many projects(e.g. zcash and ethereum 2.0) now use BLS 12-381 for BLS signature. BN256 is documented as weak in this issue. Is there a plan to add support for BLS12-381?

@jeffallen
Copy link
Contributor

No, there is no plan for that, but we do accept PRs.

@nikkolasg
Copy link
Collaborator

Note there is a now a wrapper around a very good performant bls12-381 library. Unfortunately wrapper is for a fork of kyber. Mentionning just in case.
https://github.com/drand/kyber-bls12381/

@wangyifan
Copy link
Author

@nikkolasg thanks for the heads up. I will take a look.

@pierluca
Copy link
Contributor

This has been added in #505

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants