Skip to content

A redex-inspired language of operational semantics with an automatic "abstracting abstract machines" transformation.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

deeglaze/AAM-ify

Repository files navigation

AAM-ify

A PLT Redex-inspired language of operational semantics with an automatic "abstracting abstract machines" transformation.

Auditing the code

The code is heavily commented with design decisions, descriptions of abstractions and rationale. The following tags have significance:

TODO[?]: A point in the code where an addition is necessary/suggested (respectively) for later commits.

FIXME[?]: A piece of code that is absolutely broken or needs re-evaluation later (respectively).

XXX: Discusses caveats to a design decision, or a less sure "FIXME?"

INVARIANT: Description of a property that should hold invariably.

ASSUMPTION: Like an invariant, but based more on user interaction than program behavior.

UNCHECKED ASSUMPTION: An unproven/poorly justified proposition about user interaction.

OPT: Description of how some piece of code/data structure was optimized.

OPT-OP: An unimplemented idea for an optimization opportunity.

NOTE: A decidedly tricky piece of code follows. This note is a careful explanation.

ADDITIONAL FEATURES:

  • abstract counting for better equality matching [1]
  • "address spaces" divvy items amongst as many stores that get automatically added.
  • Addresses can be marked for pointer equality, or for equality to automatically dereference.
    • Addresses introduced by the AAM transformation are the latter kind, in the 'AAM address space.
  • finite functions (dictionaries) and sets are natively supported. The burden of ensuring associativity/commutivity of meta-functions on these data is left to the user.
  • pattern support for sets and maps

PLANNED WISHLIST:

  • build an escape hatch for smarter lattices.
  • widening for control flow
  • automatic garbage collection in "weak maps." Addresses of different spaces can occur in mapped objects.
  • add a new "binding" form like When, only non-local. Failure leads to trying the next major rule.
  • Synthesize a better alloc skeleton with more user guidance/annotations.
  • Drop distinction between terms and expressions. Variant constructors and meta-functions inhabit same namespace.
  • Add annotation for trusted termination of meta-functions so the memo table isn't necessary.
  • Smarter abstraction of maps so that the CEK machine is automatically transformed into the CESK^*_t machine.

UNPLANNED WISHLIST:

  • Arrow expanders (--> position in reduction-relation is expanded)
  • Hygienic macros in expressions
  • Predicative parametric polymorphism
  • a compiler to output specialized Racket code implementing an input language's semantics. Take alloc syntax and partially evaluate?
  • a higher-level language with binding specifications, synthesized substitution and contextual matching that compiles to a closure-based semantics and reified continuations.

[1] Might and Shivers ICFP 2006 "Improving flow analyses via ΓCFA: Abstract garbage collection and counting"

About

A redex-inspired language of operational semantics with an automatic "abstracting abstract machines" transformation.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Languages