Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip scaffold generation on invalid molecules #3520

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 14, 2023

Conversation

arunppsg
Copy link
Contributor

@arunppsg arunppsg commented Aug 9, 2023

Description

Fix #3512

Add a conditional check to skip scaffold split on invalid molecules.

Type of change

Please check the option that is related to your PR.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
    • In this case, we recommend to discuss your modification on GitHub issues before creating the PR
  • Documentations (modification for documents)

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this
    project
    • Run yapf -i <modified file> and check no errors (yapf version must be 0.32.0)
    • Run mypy -p deepchem and check no errors
    • Run flake8 <modified file> --count and check no errors
    • Run python -m doctest <modified file> and check no errors
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

logger.info(
'Not generating scaffold for smiles %s - invalid smiles string' %
smiles)
return None
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What happened previously when mol was None? We should make sure not to break existing functionality

Copy link
Contributor Author

@arunppsg arunppsg Aug 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It throws ValueError and the code does not execute.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add this to the docstring to explain the difference?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added docs in 2f35436

scaffolds[scaffold] = [ind]
else:
scaffolds[scaffold].append(ind)
if scaffold is not None:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What happened previously in these cases?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the code will not execute (ref: #3512) - but now, it can execute.

Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have some questions on whether we are backwards compatible on this change

Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@arunppsg arunppsg merged commit df89c79 into deepchem:master Aug 14, 2023
22 of 33 checks passed
@arunppsg arunppsg deleted the fix-scaffold-split branch August 15, 2023 11:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scaffold splitting of BBBP dataset
2 participants