Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LightGBM - GBDT model earlystop bug fix #3614

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

aaronrockmenezes
Copy link
Contributor

@aaronrockmenezes aaronrockmenezes commented Oct 16, 2023

Description

Fix for #3559

Added callbacks for early stopping for newer versions of LightGBM and XGBoost.

Type of change

Please check the option that is related to your PR.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
    • In this case, we recommend to discuss your modification on GitHub issues before creating the PR
  • Documentations (modification for documents)

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
    • Run yapf -i <modified file> and check no errors (yapf version must be 0.32.0)
    • Run mypy -p deepchem and check no errors
    • Run flake8 <modified file> --count and check no errors
    • Run python -m doctest <modified file> and check no errors
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

@aaronrockmenezes aaronrockmenezes marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2023 18:14
@aaronrockmenezes aaronrockmenezes marked this pull request as draft October 16, 2023 18:17
Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aaronrockmenezes Excited to see this! A quick reminder to make sure to add some additional unit tests to check this new functionality

@aaronrockmenezes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rbharath I had a doubt. The original code used early stopping by default. Wouldn't it be better if we kept it as an option? It would make the code a little longer, but seems fair.
Also, could you please help me out with what unit tests I should include? (I haven't ever done unit testing :/ )

@aaronrockmenezes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rbharath Added test to keep early stopping greater than 1.
I thought of adding a test to check if early stopping is triggered but can't do that as it need not always trigger within the given number of estimators/epochs.
In any case, if we think a test a necessary, I have code to check if the best iteration comes before the total number of iterations.

if self.early_stopping_rounds<=0:
raise ValueError("Early Stopping Rounds cannot be less than 1.")

if self.model.__class__.__name__.startswith('XGB'):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add a unit test for callbacks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I'll do that

@aaronrockmenezes aaronrockmenezes marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2023 16:28
Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few changes needed:

  • Fix mypy issues
  • Add explicit unit tests
  • Remove assert statements and instead raise exceptions instead

Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to merge in once CI is clear

Copy link
Member

@rbharath rbharath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rbharath rbharath merged commit 933e3b9 into deepchem:master Nov 8, 2023
24 of 33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants