Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix TestDeepPotAPBCExcludeTypes #2680

Merged

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jul 15, 2023

I found that #956 broke this unit test, making it only testing a standard model.

I found that deepmodeling#956 broke this unit test. It only tested a normal model.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from denghuilu July 15, 2023 00:20
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3a5f7cf) 78.36% compared to head (a8b62c7) 78.37%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #2680      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.36%   78.37%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         235      235              
  Lines       24488    24497       +9     
  Branches     1469     1469              
==========================================
+ Hits        19189    19200      +11     
+ Misses       4909     4905       -4     
- Partials      390      392       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/api_cc/src/common.cc 79.18% <100.00%> (+0.38%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 1a4f51f into deepmodeling:devel Jul 15, 2023
39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants