Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

benchmark performance of import #653

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented May 11, 2024

Do a benchmark before working on #526

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced benchmark tests for import functionality and command line interface operations.
  • Tests
    • Added new benchmark tests to assess performance improvements.
  • Chores
    • Integrated pytest and pytest-codspeed into the project for enhanced testing capabilities.

Do a benchmark before working on deepmodeling#522

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on bolstering testing capabilities through the introduction of benchmark testing for a Python package. The project now features a GitHub Actions workflow (benchmark.yml) that sets up Python, installs dependencies, and executes benchmarks using CodSpeedHQ. Furthermore, the pyproject.toml file now includes pytest and pytest-codspeed in the benchmark section to support these new tests. A new test file, test_import.py, has been added to assess importing dpdata and its command line interface.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml Introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for running benchmarks using CodSpeedHQ.
pyproject.toml Added pytest and pytest-codspeed to the benchmark section.
tests/benchmark/test_import.py Added benchmark tests for importing dpdata and testing the dpdata command line interface.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.63%. Comparing base (8b9fd0f) to head (cd9cc4f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel     #653   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.63%   83.63%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        7009     7009           
=======================================
  Hits         5862     5862           
  Misses       1147     1147           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented May 11, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Congrats! CodSpeed is installed 🎉

🆕 2 new benchmarks were detected.

You will start to see performance impacts in the reports once the benchmarks are run from your default branch.

Detected benchmarks

  • test_cli (671.5 µs)
  • test_import (729 µs)

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2024 02:20
@adriencaccia
Copy link

Hey @njzjz, I am a co-founder @CodSpeedHQ, glad to see you trying out our tool!

You use the CodSpeed action inside a matrix, thus running the action 3 times with different Python versions.
However, this will not work properly as CodSpeed is built to run only once per PR. There might be instances where the job is picked up correctly, and not the same Python version will be picked up each time.

I recommend that you create a separate workflow file or job with a single Python version and single use of the CodSpeed action. I recommend using Python 3.12, so that you can benefit from the automated flamegraphs in the CodSpeed UI 😉

@njzjz
Copy link
Member Author

njzjz commented May 14, 2024

I recommend that you create a separate workflow file or job with a single Python version and single use of the CodSpeed action. I recommend using Python 3.12, so that you can benefit from the automated flamegraphs in the CodSpeed UI 😉

Thanks for your friendly reminder!

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as draft May 14, 2024 01:21
@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2024 21:12
@njzjz njzjz merged commit 02309f7 into deepmodeling:devel May 15, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants