Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cacert fix and cleanup #284

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: cacert fix and cleanup #284

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

UnicornChance
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • There was some extra fields accidentally brought into the cacert for keycloak istio gateways, removed those.

  • Task to copy cacert generated in identity-config into gateways doesn't work on non-mac users machines. Fix for that task and a change will be added to the identity side as well in this branch.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Other (security config, docs update, etc)

Checklist before merging

Comment on lines +37 to +38
yq eval-all --inplace 'select(fileIndex == 0) * select(fileIndex == 1)' src/istio/values/config-tenant.yaml tls_cacert.yaml
yq eval-all --inplace 'select(fileIndex == 0) * select(fileIndex == 1)' src/istio/values/config-admin.yaml tls_cacert.yaml
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it correct that this shouldn't be merged until an updated identity-config image/task is actually producing tls_cacert.yaml?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mjnagel correct. This task is not actively being used anywhere so we wouldnt see anything break. The identity change is captured in my registration integration test branch which is still wip.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants