Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update deltadb-common-utils to version 0.0.3 πŸš€ #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2015

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

deltadb-common-utils just published its new version 0.0.3, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of deltadb-common-utils – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 10 commits .

  • cdf823b 0.0.3
  • 2cb23a8 Merge pull request #23 from redgeoff/utils-resolve-now
  • d2e254f test(utils): coverage for changes
  • be00192 feat(utils): resolve on event
  • d35c2c1 fix(packages): update es5-shim
  • 791cee1 Merge pull request #21 from delta-db/greenkeeper-coveralls-2.11.6
  • 9774dd4 chore(package): update coveralls to version 2.11.6
  • 2abc7d2 Merge pull request #18 from redgeoff/build
  • 3af7b2d fix(build): unique name
  • b187d22 feat(build)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

redgeoff added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2015
…0.0.3

Update deltadb-common-utils to version 0.0.3 πŸš€
@redgeoff redgeoff merged commit 7fae882 into master Dec 15, 2015
@redgeoff redgeoff deleted the greenkeeper-deltadb-common-utils-0.0.3 branch December 15, 2015 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants