bytes/equals incorrectly handles subarrays

[tjjfvi]

import { assert, assertEquals } from "jsr:@std/assert"
import { equals } from "jsr:@std/bytes"

const a = new Uint8Array(1001).subarray(1)
const b = new Uint8Array(1000)

a[0] = 123
b[0] = 123

assertEquals(a, b) // ok
assert(equals(a, b)) // error; false negative

import { assert, assertNotEquals } from "jsr:@std/assert"
import { equals } from "jsr:@std/bytes"

const a = new Uint8Array(1001).subarray(1)
const b = new Uint8Array(1000)

a[999] = 123

assertNotEquals(a, b) // ok
assert(!equals(a, b)) // error; false positive

The equals32Bit implementation does not account for subarrays.

[kt3k]

Maybe equals32Bit is only usable when both a.byteOffset and b.byteOffset are multiple of 4.

cc @Aplet123

[Aplet123]

I think it would take some benchmarking to see if it's better to do the 8 bit approach when byteOffset isn't a multiple of 4 vs constructing a new Uint8Array from the sliced one so there's no longer any byte offset.

[tjjfvi]

equals32Bit could also be usable when a.byteOffset % 4 === b.byteOffset % 4 with some small tweaks.

[iuioiua]

Performance fixes applied in #4635.