Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: include statically analyzable dynamic imports in the eszip #115

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

dsherret
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure why this was disallowed. This allows people to run deno compile with statically analyzable dynamic imports.

Copy link
Member

@lucacasonato lucacasonato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a test please

@dsherret
Copy link
Member Author

dsherret commented Feb 11, 2023

@dsherret dsherret merged commit bef6991 into denoland:main Feb 12, 2023
@dsherret dsherret deleted the eszip_statically_analyzable branch February 12, 2023 18:32
andreubotella added a commit to andreubotella/deno that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2023
denoland/eszip#115 added support for statically-analyzed dynamic
imports in eszip, which made `deno compile` support dynamic imports
starting from denoland#17858. This PR adds a test for it.
dsherret pushed a commit to denoland/deno that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2023
denoland/eszip#115 added support for statically-analyzed dynamic imports
in eszip, which made `deno compile` support dynamic imports starting
from #17858. This PR adds a test for it.

----

This test is adapted from PR #17663.

Closes #17908
kt3k pushed a commit to denoland/deno that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2023
denoland/eszip#115 added support for statically-analyzed dynamic imports
in eszip, which made `deno compile` support dynamic imports starting
from #17858. This PR adds a test for it.

----

This test is adapted from PR #17663.

Closes #17908
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants