-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copy audit: Caseflow - Surfaced Copy Areas #7036
Comments
For Change 3:1st line: "You have assigned an administrative action (FOIA Request)"
2nd line: "If you need to make any changes, please email your administration action team" |
@sneha-pai's (first?!) copy PR to address change 3! #7078 |
@laurjpeterson , here is some proposed copy for change 2: Line 1: Select special issues that are relevant to this case Rationale: It would be helpful to tell attorneys (especially those who are new to Caseflow) how checking special issues will affect the lifecycle of a case, both showing them how Caseflow works and providing some context into why it's important to check the right issues. Questions:
|
Thanks @allyceh! Re: proposed copyI like your first option, with one small tweak:
Follow-up q:
Your questions
|
@laurjpeterson Cool! I'm good with those tweaks and I feel that it's helpful to mention that it's optional. How about: Line 1: Select special issues that are relevant to this case (optional) |
From #6854. I wrote: Additionally, she missed the POA/agent special issue checkbox (located at the bottom left of the page) and only realized it when we asked her to return to the page. Should we make this more prominent since the majority of cases have POA? Should it be the first special issue if it's the most common? Can we default the POA checkbox if a veteran has a POA in VBMS?"_ Per discussion on #6854 , let's revisit the copy on this page to provide more context around 1) what these special issues are, 2) what the attorney needs to do on this page, 3) how we use any special issues they check (routing purposes) could help orient first time users. Let's also explore which special issues are most commonly checked, POA aside. Should these issue be included at the beginning of the list for better findability? |
@laurjpeterson @sneha-pai @lowellrex Below is a draft mock of the special issues page for AMA cases: Looking for feedback on:
Updates include:
Open questions:
|
@allyceh - see this ticket #7216 special issues for Legacy cases are currently displayed in Caseflow Dispatch, which is where we got this design from to quickly implement it for AMA cases. (This ticket and its comments explain why some were excluded from AMA cases - #6854) My feedback:
To do's:
|
Here is an updated mock: @nicholasholtz Can we have your eyes on this from an attorney perspective? @shanear , can you confirm that "Veteran resides in" is an accurate label for the special issues in this mock? |
#2 in 2020 |
Change 1: ✅ Resolved by @evankroske #7038
Alex: What should this say when reviewing an AMA case? probably shouldn't mention DAS
Change 2: @allyceh to work on instruction copy which will sit right below the header. Micro-copy for each type of special issue is out of scope for now (Attorneys are familiar with these various names)
Alex: Since this is a new step for attorneys working AMA cases, do you think it's worthwhile to actually add some instructional text here? or are we thinking users won't be confused and will be familiar with how to do this.
Commentary:
Allyce: Jumping in. I think it would be nice to include a quick blurb next to each special issue about what it is, especially for attorneys who are newer to the board and learning. I am happy to take a stab at it when I can get explanations of what each of these are.
Lauren:
Good q. Holtz reminded me that attorneys used to select “special interests” in their VACOLS checkout flow, so they do have some familiarity with doing this type of extra step. That being said, some explanatory text would definitely be better to have.
Change 3: ✅ Resolved by @sneha-pai #7078
Alex: this copy appears when creating a FOIA colocated task, does it seem like the headline might need a tweak? "FOIA request was submitted successfully" hmm
Commentary
Nicholas: same text appears (or similar, at least) when a judge dispatches an AMA appeal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: