Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - Privacy Act Statement variation and customization

# Feature Request #381

Closed
1 task done
kristenmcconnell opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@kristenmcconnell
Copy link
Contributor

Feature Request

  • I’ve searched for any related issues and avoided creating a duplicate issue.

Is this feature request relating to an existing component or utility? Please describe.

  • Component/utility name: Two changes are proposed for the Privacy Act Statement modal, in order to address current use cases.
    Screen Shot 2021-01-19 at 1 37 29 PM

Do you have a suggestion for a new component or utility?

  1. The first line of the respondent burden paragraph within the privacy act statement always states the feature is for “education benefits,” even when the feature is something else like the caregiver or health questionnaire forms. This can be seen on almost every form implemented on va.gov. This wording needs to be customizable so it can list the actual name of the feature.
    Education benefits

  2. Health questionnaires will not have a respondent burden or OMB control number. Therefore, the entire respondent burden section of the privacy act statement does not apply. The health questionnaires team discussed keeping our own version of the privacy act statement minus the respondent burden in our code. However, we wouldn’t know when and if any updates occur to the privacy act notice section. Therefore, we wanted to know if the respondent burden paragraph could be made optional at the platform level?
    Respondent Burden

@caw310
Copy link
Contributor

caw310 commented Dec 9, 2021

@kristenmcconnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since I entered this ticket, the Forms Library Platform Spike Team has spun up. Would this be something that they should be aware of, since the request involves changes to code on a Forms Library component?

@caw310
Copy link
Contributor

caw310 commented Dec 13, 2021

@kristenmcconnell , yes. I can share this with the forms library team. Although we may work on this so we may make the change.

@kristenmcconnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you.

@caw310 caw310 closed this as completed Mar 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants