Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the README file. #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2016
Merged

Update the README file. #102

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2016

Conversation

lijunle
Copy link
Member

@lijunle lijunle commented Feb 23, 2016

  • Depcheck has a bigger scope.
  • It mentions more functions in README.
  • It gives more examples to understand the output.
  • Encourage people to report false alerts.

- Depcheck has a bigger scope.
- It mentions more functions in README.
- It gives more examples to understand the output.
- Encourage people to report false alerts.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 98.06%

Merging #102 into master will not affect coverage as of 85f36d0

@@            master    #102   diff @@
======================================
  Files           16      16       
  Stmts          362     362       
  Branches        81      81       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit            355     355       
  Partial          5       5       
  Missed           2       2       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 85f36d0

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

lijunle added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2016
@lijunle lijunle merged commit 66d598d into depcheck:master Feb 24, 2016
@lijunle lijunle deleted the update-readme branch February 24, 2016 15:18
nigelzor pushed a commit to nigelzor/depcheck that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2018
Treat parser returned packages as dependencies directly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants