Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix POTENTIAL table #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 13, 2018
Merged

fix POTENTIAL table #156

merged 1 commit into from Dec 13, 2018

Conversation

sbailey
Copy link
Contributor

@sbailey sbailey commented Dec 13, 2018

This PR fixes #155 where the assigned TARGETID for each fiber didn't appear in the potential assignments list for each fiber. It was a side affect of PR #147 that ensured that the FIBERASSIGN HDU output was sorted by TARGETID.

I also added a check in qa-fiberassign that would have caught this.

@tskisner a new fiberassign run of the 18.11 target list is in /global/cscratch1/sd/sjbailey/desi/fiberassign/18.11-redo . Please check whether those potential assignments more closely match what you have in the tsk_refactor branch.

@tskisner
Copy link
Member

Hello @sbailey , yes the available targets HDU now looks good in master branch.

@sbailey sbailey merged commit 2ae47d9 into master Dec 13, 2018
@sbailey sbailey deleted the potential branch December 13, 2018 17:06
sbailey added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

POTENTIAL list is wrong
2 participants