Skip to content

Check bindingContext only once in MemberNameEqualsClassName#3899

Merged
BraisGabin merged 2 commits intodetekt:mainfrom
schalkms:bindingContext-check
Jun 25, 2021
Merged

Check bindingContext only once in MemberNameEqualsClassName#3899
BraisGabin merged 2 commits intodetekt:mainfrom
schalkms:bindingContext-check

Conversation

@schalkms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change simplifies the MemberNameEqualsClassName rule.
For a class/function pair the bindingContext check happens once.

This change simplifies the MemberNameEqualsClassName rule.
For a class/function pair the bindingContext check happens once.
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3899 (44534f9) into main (703487e) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #3899   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.54%   83.55%           
+ Complexity     3119     3118    -1     
=========================================
  Files           456      456           
  Lines          8974     8973    -1     
  Branches       1746     1746           
=========================================
  Hits           7497     7497           
+ Misses          565      564    -1     
  Partials        912      912           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...h/detekt/rules/naming/MemberNameEqualsClassName.kt 84.21% <40.00%> (+2.15%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 703487e...44534f9. Read the comment docs.

@cortinico cortinico added this to the 1.18.0 milestone Jun 25, 2021
@BraisGabin BraisGabin merged commit 66f20e7 into detekt:main Jun 25, 2021
@cortinico cortinico changed the title Check bindingContext only once Check bindingContext only once in MemberNameEqualsClassName Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants