Don't exclude tests in WildcardImport Rule

[BraisGabin]

Context: #5116 (comment)

This PR is also kind of "housekeeping" because I remove the 'java.util.*' as a valid Wildcard import as we have in the default values.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5121 (fc5b7c0) into main (c46b9ec) will increase coverage by 84.92%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head fc5b7c0 differs from pull request most recent head 3feb39f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3feb39f to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5121       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage        0   84.92%   +84.92%     
- Complexity      0     3614     +3614     
===========================================
  Files           0      502      +502     
  Lines           0    11886    +11886     
  Branches        0     2237     +2237     
===========================================
+ Hits            0    10094    +10094     
- Misses          0      689      +689     
- Partials        0     1103     +1103     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ab/arturbosch/detekt/formatting/KtLintMultiRule.kt	96.42% <ø> (ø)
...etekt/generator/printer/defaultconfig/Exclusion.kt	96.87% <ø> (ø)
...ab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/naming/PackageNaming.kt	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...lab/arturbosch/detekt/core/FileProcessorLocator.kt	69.23% <0.00%> (ø)
...arturbosch/detekt/core/rules/SingleRuleProvider.kt	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...osch/detekt/core/baseline/BaselineResultMapping.kt	78.57% <0.00%> (ø)
...b/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ForbiddenImport.kt	96.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...bosch/detekt/rules/complexity/LabeledExpression.kt	86.20% <0.00%> (ø)
.../arturbosch/detekt/core/reporting/ReportLocator.kt	92.30% <0.00%> (ø)
...osch/detekt/generator/printer/DeprecatedPrinter.kt	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 494 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c46b9ec...3feb39f. Read the comment docs.

[3flex]

This looks like it has #5130 mixed in, I'm guessing that was unintentional and that this should be focused only on the update to remove the exclusion for test sources and fix the new issues that are reported?

[BraisGabin]

This looks like it has #5130 mixed in, I'm guessing that was unintentional and that this should be focused only on the update to remove the exclusion for test sources and fix the new issues that are reported?

You are right. I have far too many open branches right now >_<

[3flex]

I've tagged it as a notable change because some users will get new issues reported if they're using the default config.