revert(#69): pydantic dataclasses #86
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
giuliano-macedo
requested review from
abelroes,
julianapsilva,
luuizpaulo1,
newtonjose,
rafaelclubbi,
rfukui and
vanessanunes
giuliano-macedo
force-pushed
the
revert/pydantic-dataclasses
branch
from
a5c4f51
to
d5c00e0
Compare
rfukui
approved these changes
May 30, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this PR?
It reverts #69 because pydantic version 1.9.1 includes this PR that fixes this issue.
How this change should be tested?
Importing this dataclass
from clubbi_utils.dataclasses.dataclass import dataclassshould result in an import exception.Change type