Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.

No package 'rubygem(sass-rails)' available. #52

Closed
voxik opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

No package 'rubygem(sass-rails)' available. #52

voxik opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@voxik
Copy link
Contributor

voxik commented Apr 12, 2013

These are my dependencies:

  dependencies:
  - rpm:
    - rubygem(rails)
    - rubygem(sqlite3)
    - rubygem(jquery-rails)
    - rubygem(coffee-rails)
    - rubygem(sass-rails)

Unfortunately, the sass-rails cannot be installed for some non-obvious reasons:

INFO - Checking for presence of rubygem(coffee-rails)...
INFO - Found rubygem-coffee-rails-3.2.2-1.fc18.noarch
INFO - Checking for presence of rubygem(sass-rails)...
INFO - Not found
INFO - Installing: rubygem(sass-rails)
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, security
No package 'rubygem(sass-rails)' available.
Error: Nothing to do
ERROR - Failed to install: rubygem(sass-rails)

While it can be installed from command line just fine:

# yum install 'rubygem(sass-rails)'
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, security
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package rubygem-sass-rails.noarch 0:3.2.5-1.fc18 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: rubygem(sass) >= 3.1.10 for package: rubygem-sass-rails-3.2.5-1.fc18.noarch
@voxik
Copy link
Contributor Author

voxik commented Apr 12, 2013

Please note that changing the dependency to rubygem-sass-rails works, but anyway, there is no reason why virtual provide should not work (especially if they work in other cases).

@ghost ghost assigned bkabrda Apr 15, 2013
@bkabrda
Copy link
Member

bkabrda commented Apr 15, 2013

Good catch. After some investigation, it turns out to be an issue in plumbum, the library used for executing commandline commands. I reported the problem [1] and we'll see what the upstream has to say about that. Working around on devassistant side would also be possible, but let's wait for the plumbum upstream first...

[1] tomerfiliba/plumbum#61

bkabrda added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2013
@bkabrda bkabrda closed this as completed in 050d673 May 6, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants