Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #60

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update README.md #60

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tswayne
Copy link

@tswayne tswayne commented Jan 21, 2018

No description provided.

@devinivy
Copy link
Owner

I appreciate your offer to add a link to your project in the readme, but will respectfully decline since our plugins are quite different, and I hope that a contributor other than myself may still upgrade dogwater to work with the latest versions of hapi and waterline. I would happily review and accept such a contribution!

@tswayne
Copy link
Author

tswayne commented Oct 26, 2018

Seeing that this repo still hasn't been updated to the latest version of hapi and waterline I still think it would be useful to point your community to a maintained library that ultimately accomplishes the same thing.

@devinivy
Copy link
Owner

There are a few hapi plugins that integrate hapi and waterline, but none of them have the same design goals (i.e. support for multi-plugin architecture, full test coverage, etc.) as dogwater. We have created a new plugin called schwifty as part of the hapi pal ecosystem which has similar design goals, but works with Objection ORM rather than Waterline. It's really nothing against your plugin—it seems like it has been working well for you for a while now, which is 👌—I would be more likely point users to a plugin with similar design goals to dogwater. And again, of course my ideal option would be for someone else to maintain this plugin!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants