Docs for TrieMap module

[matthewhammer]

I followed @kritzcreek's example in HashMap.

One question for the hyperlinks: What happens when we produce non-html output?

The current links seem brittle and likely to break, right? (or link to the wrong kind of document when we generate non-html output?)

[kritzcreek]

One question for the hyperlinks: What happens when we produce non-html output?

They just appear unescaped as the text in the comment. Not pretty but can at least be deciphered.

The current links seem brittle and likely to break, right?

They are. We'll need to come up with a referencing schema. My plan is to start with the intra-rustdoc RFC and see how far that would get us. I fear it'll involve me writing/extending an OCaml Markdown parser which I'm not excited about.

[kritzcreek]

Just a few links

[crusso]

LGTM, applied @kritzcreek comments, so will merge

[crusso]

Looks like @kritzcreek needs to approve again

[matthewhammer]

Looks like @kritzcreek needs to approve again

What's the reviewer semantics here? I'm afraid that (as usual), I may be misunderstanding some aspect of GitHub : )

For instance, is it preferable to have more reviewers for a quick review, or fewer (e.g., do they all need to re-approve every commit)?